Court Halts Trial Of Peace Corps Boss, Akoh
Posted: 13/Jun/2018

The Abuja division of the Federal High Court yesterday halted the trial of the National Commandant of the Peace Corps of Nigeria, Ambassador Dickson Akoh in the 13 count alleged criminal charges brought against him by the Nigerian police.

Justice john Tsoho stopped the trial in protest of the persistent refusal of police to open the Corporate Head office of the Corps sealed up since February 28, 2017 during its official commissioning in Abuja.
 
Delivering ruling in the motion on notice brought against police by Akoh, the court held that police as an institution established by law must not be seen breaking laws and disregarding court orders and judgments with impunity.

In the ruling that lasted about 30 minutes the court said that it was wrong of police to have chosen to disobey two judgments of the court which directed it to unseal the office in the past one year.

Justice Tsoho agreed with counsel to the Peace Corp boss, john Ochogwu that Akoh as a defendant in the 13 count alleged criminal charges had been disadvantaged in preparing for his defence in the charges against him as required by law.

The court held that the police have breached section 36 of the 1999 constitution as amended by refusing to give the defendant adequate time and opportunity to prove his innocence in the charges against him by sealing up the office where the material for defence were said to have been kept.

The judge said that the police which relied heavily on speedy trial of the defendant must be seen adhering strictly to the rule of law and natural justice by ensuring that the defendant was not disadvanatgely placed.

“It has often been said that justice is not for one part but for all including the state. In the instant case police cannot be said to be fair anf just to the defendant by sealing up the office were the defence materials could be obtained and at the same time demanding for speedy trial at the court.

“Let the point be made that the hand of the police is not clean by refusing to obey court judgments and at the same t

This court is swayed by the argument of counsel to the applicant /defendant in his reply on point of law that the police had flouted a valid order made by the court.

“If the police truly deserves adherence to or compliance with the law, it should first show good example by respecting the law,

“It cannot be reasonably encouraged to promote the hiprocracy of requiring others to be subject of the law while the police wears the toga of an outlaw with impunity.

“there is a democratic norm that no person or institution is above the law, consequently the judge stopped the trial when there is evidence that police has complied with the order of the court.

By: Godwin Tsa, Abuja
The Daily Sun News